It's time to hammer the last nail into horrible Don Bluth sequels' coffin. This time Radical Reviewer reviews All Dogs Go To Heaven 2.

Comments Section:

Name: Devon
Date And Time: 2010-10-12 17:15:04
Comment: I never saw "All Dogs Go to Heaven", but I'm sure that MGM Animation screwed it up with a sequel BIG TIME.

Name: Ken Murray
Date And Time: 2010-10-12 06:13:31
Comment: and the joke you made that's the default image here made me angry. mostly because I honestly believe that all fiction is reality in alternate universes. so, Charlie's real and didn't deserve that.

Name: Devon
Date And Time: 2010-10-09 16:40:30
Comment: This has got to be your best video yet, RR, after your review of "The King and I" (1999).

Name: Ken Murray
Date And Time: 2010-10-07 19:53:14
Comment: and you wanna know the sad thing, you acually included a clip of Charlie saying Ichy choked to death. I was beginning to think you just don't watch the movies you review all the way through, you don't even double check your own videos!

Name: Ken Murray
Date And Time: 2010-09-18 21:18:36
Comment: and some of the other comments on your channel are right, you don't do the best job researching.

Name: Ken Murray
Date And Time: 2010-09-18 21:14:31
Comment: and I think the explanation for why Itchy seems to live for decades before he dies is because the passage of time in Heaven is deferent then on Earth.

Name: Ken Murray
Date And Time: 2010-09-04 23:01:14
Comment: I think this was a great. Charlie was sick of the afterlife and couldn't do the thing he did on Earth there, his actions aren't justifiable but they are understandable. I liked this on better then the first, I guess because I relate better to a movie set in a time period that I was alive in.

Name: Sara
Date And Time: 2010-09-04 09:28:08
Comment: it would've been better if Charlie went to see Anne Marie again instead of fighting with a devilish cat!

Name: Sara
Date And Time: 2010-09-04 09:20:18
Comment: Keshia Anders- i agree with you one hundred per cent, i'm not really into cats being villains and dogs being heroes. that's nuts!

Name: Keshia Anders
Date And Time: 2010-08-29 11:27:00
Comment: I really hate these movies that are speices stereotypical by making the dogs be heroes and cats be the villains. All because heroes had pet dogs(like Batman has Ace, Superman has Krypto, Inspector Gadget has Brain, ect.), while the villains had pet cats(like Dr. Claw has Mad Cat, Lady Tremaine has Lucifer, Dr. Evil has Mr.Begalsworth, ect.) That why I loathe "Cats & Dogs" and it's uncessary sequal.

Name: PianoMan
Date And Time: 2010-08-06 15:17:49
Comment: I like how you trashed this film, but you need to get your facts right. The girl from the first movie couldn't be in it because she was dead after the release of the film. You jokes about trying to go and find her don't make since and are unfunny. Also, Itchy died because he choked on a chicken bone. The more false your facts are, the less entertaining your review is and the more annoyed your audience gets trying to yell at you to research your info and not base your work on biased opinions.

Name: Leroy629
Date And Time: 2010-07-03 22:10:05
Comment: Sorry for double posting. Some key factors, Annabelle said in the first movie, they have books or records; they know everything. So when a dog dies they know as soon as that book is published...Charlie could have tampered with that, but it's very unlikely. Second the animation style was changed because MGM was animating, that's why Charlie looks a little different, I'm sure you knew this too. Maybe they wanted to make him look younger. I think his TV animation is the worst out of the franchise. Even if Charlie wanted to go check on Anne-Marie he would've had to take a plane or bus, this movie is in San Fransisco and the first one was set in New Orleans, kind out of his way. She is probably living well. Charlie is also a street-wise conman, it was time to take a second chance at life and snoop around :)

Name: Leroy629
Date And Time: 2010-07-03 21:41:54
Comment: I think someone already mentioned Itchy was choking on a chicken wing. Like you said there are so many time loops in this movie. The first movie was set in 1939 and the second in 1996, how is Itchy still alive? He should have died ages ago, Ann-Marie might still be alive, but she'd be very old.

Name: Radical Reviewer
Date And Time: 2010-07-03 05:15:36
Comment: At some point in the future perhaphs.

Name: Terry
Date And Time: 2010-07-02 15:47:46
Comment: Since you are reviewing most of the Bluth sequels....why not do all the Land Before Time sequels

Name: Siarra
Date And Time: 2010-07-01 17:59:13
Comment: I remember growing up with this movie along with the 1st. I haven't seen it in a while but seeing this review makes me want to stay far away from it now. Oh and I looked this movie up on wikipedia; Itchy choked to death on a drumstick and David left because his mom died and his dad and stepmom were having a kid. But I got your joke with that. I saw like 1 episode of the series and it never came back on and I also grew up with the xmas special. And I actually don't mind it.

Name: Sara
Date And Time: 2010-07-01 13:51:11
Comment: All Dogs go to Heaven 2 was fine, but the first one was better! and Charlie's face from the first movie was way better then the one in the second movie. i love your reaction of Charlie's face in the second one! Priceless!!!!! thanks for reviewing this movie!

Name: live long and rock
Date And Time: 2010-07-01 00:05:51
Comment: this is weird i was watching this yesterday and that night i wondered when your next review come out. That is freaky

Name: Jaimetud
Date And Time: 2010-06-30 22:08:02
Comment: Good trashing. This movie deserved it. I hated it when I was a kid, and I still don't like it. My only nitpick is that you forgot to mention the butt gag that happens at the end of the devil cat's musical number, a gag which still disturbs me to this day.